What does Gordon Peterson mean by equal opportunity

[88%-D88%88%]

Equality of opportunities of Opportunity: fair competition for jobs away from any kind of discrimination and opening up to applicants for employment without regard to race, sex, colour or affiliation; evaluation and acceptance are the result of comparing the qualifications of applicants and the efficiency of their respective work. Equality of outcomes Equality of Outcome: Equality between people in wealth, income and economic conditions in general, regardless of merit, competence and merit.

In the race for economic and social competition, it can be argued that equality of opportunity ensures that everyone will move from the same point and at the same time, while equality of results ensures access to the same value regardless of the starting point or timing. With this simple comparison, we can understand the radical disagreement between them, on which we will build our article. The fact that you belonged to a minority that has been devoured in the last few years is that it gives you the right to share the wealth of others and to have the same status as a person who has the right to speak. In the absence of an act of self-esteem, the purpose of which will be to create an equal footing, is to make sure that the people are left with the right to equal pay. Since the creation of better opportunities is conditional on the existence of better qualifications and higher qualities; the realization of the latter requirement - in most cases - requires better material conditions and a better standard of living so that people can be betterowed with the right to equalize their own right; on the other hand, interceptors will build their criticism that equality of opportunity necessarily entails equal results; in other words, the principle of equal day-to-day access to equal opportunities for future generations. This equality is achieved by ensuring equal support to individuals of their different affiliations and orientation, psychological stability that helps them to provide their best; it is " social welfare, respect for their humanity, recognition of the right to differentiation without being transformed into a popularity of personal ends or political ends, as well as activities that transform the available sources of income into real, long-term opportunities for the preparation of intellectually independent and capable individuals to advance society " . We return to Jordan Peterson and his opinion on equality of opportunity: Peterson, in his support for the idea of equality of opportunity, proceeds from two principles:

• Opposing class sequence in society; assessing people away from the hierarchy that raises people and gives them privileges only for being sex, age, race, colour... etc.
• Letting competition take its course without forced interference; that intervention aimed at imposing equal consequences. The criterion of acceptance and rejection is thus founded on efficiency and production capacity, and any attempt to interfere in this competition will in the long run eliminate individual talents and create a typical society in which results are prejudged by power (Governments).

Proceeding from the social wardrobe Social Darwinism, it can be said that the existence of diverse patterns of economic relations that govern the market is essentially contributing to the preservation of the dynamics of the economy and the protection of societies from stagnation. Fixed idealistic doctrines cannot be applied in an era governed by change every day and every moment; values or social or economic law that do not support the survival and development of societies must be extinctted, and cooperation are indispensable to a necessity of competition. Despite their severity, the idea of allowing clean competition is an important factor in sustaining the economic movement and stimulating individual development and social advancement.